What Is Civic Sense Really About
Civic sense is one of those terms we hear frequently but infrequently define. We suppose it means not littering. Not sticking on roads. Queuing duly. Following business rules. All of that’s true, but it’s also deficient. Civic sense is really about one thing — feting that public space is participated space. That your freedom ends where someone differently’s comfort begins. That the road, the demesne, the machine, the path — these do n’t belong to you alone. They belong to everyone. In proposition, utmost Indians understand this. Ask anyone and they will tell you that littering is wrong, that jumping ranges is bad, that honking unnecessarily is annoying. But proposition and practice are two different effects. We know the rules. We just do n’t follow them.
Let me start with commodity that happed last week. I was staying at a machine stop in my megacity. It was evening, crowded, people tired after work. A woman was standing with a small child, perhaps four times old, holding his hand tightly. The child was fussy, tired, wanted to sit. But there was no space on the bench. Three youthful men were sitting there, scrolling through their phones, fully unconscious. The woman kept standing. The child kept crying. The men didn’t move.
Nothing said anything. Not me moreover. I’m shamed to admit that.
After ten twinkles, a machine arrived. The men got on. The woman eventually sat down, exhausted. And I stood there allowing — what just happed? Why did three healthy youthful men not get up for a woman with a child, including me, ask them to move? Why is this normal?
That’s what this essay is about. Not just communal sense, but the silence that surrounds its failure. The gap between knowing what’s right and doing what’s right. The question of who’s responsible when a society forgets how to bear in public.
Why? The Education Gap We Do Not Talk About
Let me be honest. I went to a good academy. We had moral wisdom classes. We were tutored to be good citizens. But looking back, I don’t flash back a single class that actually talked about public gesture in practical terms. We learned about the Constitution, about abecedarian duties, about great leaders. nothing tutored us what to do when you see someone littering. nothing tutored us how to offer a seat without making it awkward. nothing tutored us that communal sense is n’t just about not doing bad effects, but about laboriously doing good effects.
This is where the education gap becomes real.
Children in elite seminaries learn communal sense laterally — through exposure, through parents, through terrain. Children in underfunded government seminaries frequently do n’t get indeed that. Not because they’re less able, but because nothing prioritizes it. preceptors are busy finishing syllabi. Parents are busy earning a living. Civic education becomes an afterthought.
But then’s the thing — communal sense is n’t born from handbooks. It’s born from seeing it practiced.However, they will break rules too, If a child grows up watching grown-ups break rules.However, they will watch too, If a child grows up seeing people watch for public space. Education alone can not fix this. It has to be lived.
The Income Gap and the Resentment It Creates
There’s another subcaste to this. Income inequality. When you live in a megacity where some people have everything and others have nothing, resentment builds. And resentment expresses itself in strange ways. occasionally it expresses itself as casualness for public property. Why should I watch about this demesne when I can noway go a house that has a theater ? Why should I not spear on the road when the road is the only place I’ve to sleep at night?
I’m not justifying bad geste. I’m trying to understand it.
People who have noway possessed anything, who have noway had space that felt like theirs, frequently struggle to admire public space because public space does n’t feel like theirs moreover. It feels like someone differently’s. The government’s. The rich people’s. Not theirs.
This does n’t excuse littering or vandalization. But it explains it. And until we address the deeper inequality — the gap between those who have and those who have n’t — communal sense juggernauts will only work for people who formerly have it.
The Paradox of Individual and Collaborative Responsibility
Then’s a mystification I suppose about frequently. Everyone wants a clean megacity. But no bone wants to be the one drawing it. Everyone wants orderly ranges. But everyone tries to push ahead when they suppose no bone is watching. Everyone wants honesty. But everyone also wants their small roadway, their little advantage, their minor rule break that ever does n’t count because it’s just this formerly.
This is the incongruity of collaborative action. What’s rational for an existent is frequently disastrous for a community. Still, it does n’t count much, If I throw scrap on the road. One piece of scrap, who’ll notice? But if one lakh people suppose like me, the megacity drowns in scrap. The problem is that the detriment is distributed while the benefit is particular. I save two twinkles by not walking to the tip. The megacity pays for it with smut. But I do n’t see the smut as my smut. I see it as everyone’s smut.
This is why communal sense fails. Because the connection between action and consequence is broken in our minds.
The Information Age and Its Contradictions
We live in the age of information. We know everything. We know which countries have the cleanest metropolises. We know how Singapore fined people for littering. We know how Japan teaches children to clean their own classrooms. We’ve all the knowledge in the world at our fingertips.
And yet, we do n’t change.
Why?
Because knowing is n’t the same as wanting. Information changes what we know, not what we value. You can show someone a hundred vids of clean thoroughfares in Tokyo, and they will still throw their packet out of the auto window because that packet is no longer their problem. The information did n’t make them watch. It just made them apprehensive. Cccasionally, information indeed makes effects worse. Social media feeds us outrage. We see vids of people carrying poorly and we get angry at them, but we do n’t look at ourselves. We see someone sticking on the road and we post about it, but we do n’t defy them. We come critics of others’ geste while excusing our own.
This is the age of misinformation too not just about data, but about ourselves. We misinform ourselves into believing that we’re the good bones, that the problem is always someone differently, that if everyone differently changed, everything would be fine. But everyone differently is allowing the same thing.
The part of Fear and Enforcement
Let us be practical for a moment. Some people argue that communal sense can not be tutored, only executed. That forfeitures and corrections are the only language people understand. There’s verity in this. In countries with high communal discipline, enforcement is strict and visible. You waste, you pay. You jump a line, you’re removed. You break the rule, you face the consequence.
But enforcement has limits.
You can not put a bobby on every road corner. You can not fine every lawbreaker. And more importantly, enforcement without understanding creates resentment, not change. People follow rules not because they believe in them, but because they’re hysterical . And fear works only when the enforcer is watching. The moment no bone is watching, the old geste returns.
Real communal sense is what you do when no bone is watching. And that can not be executed. It can only be cultivated.
The Silence of onlookers
Flash back the machine stop I mentioned at the morning? The three men on their phones. The woman standing. The child crying. Me, doing nothing. Why did I not say commodity? Why did none of us say commodity?
Psychologists call this the observer effect. When numerous people are present, each person assumes someone differently will act. Responsibility diffuses. Everyone thinks someone differently will handle it, so no bone does.
But there’s commodity differently too. Fear of battle. Fear of embarrassment. Fear that if you speak up, you’ll be the bone who looks foolish, not the rule- swell. In India, calling out bad geste frequently invites aggression. People do n’t like being told they’re wrong. They get protective. They get angry. And the person who spoke ends up lamenting it.
So we stay silent. And our silence tells the rule- swell that what they’re doing is respectable. Our silence becomes authorization.
What Can Actually Be Done
After all this, the question remains — what can we do? I don’t have a perfect answer. But I’ve some studies.
First, communal sense must come visible. Children need to see grown-ups rehearsing it. Not just in seminaries, but at home, on the road, in requests. When a parent picks up a piece of scrap and puts it in the caddy, the child learns commodity no text can educate. When a schoolteacher apologizes for being late, the pupil learns respect. Modeling matters more than sermonizing.
Alternate, seminaries need to move beyond moral wisdom lectures. Civic sense should be rehearsed, not just tutored. scholars should be involved in maintaining academy cleanliness, organizing ranges, managing events. When you take power of a space, you learn to admire it. When a space is just given to you, you take it for granted.
Third, communities need to reclaim public spaces. When a demesne is used and loved by original residers, they will cover it. When a road is just a turnpike, nothing cares. The further people feel that a space belongs to them, the further they will look after it. This means involving residers in conservation, in decision- timber, in creating rules that make sense for their environment.
Fourth, we need to reevaluate enforcement. Not just forfeitures, but restorative consequences.However, make them clean for an hour, If someone litters.However, make them stand at the reverse and reflect, If someone jumps a line. discipline should connect to the detriment caused, not just prize plutocrat. plutocrat is forgotten. Experience lingers.
Fifth, we need to talk more. Not at people, but with people. exchanges about why communal sense matters, why public space is important, why small conduct add up. These exchanges wo n’t change everyone. But they will change some. And changed people change others.
The Deeper Question
Under all of this is a deeper question. What kind of society do we want to be? Do we want to be a society where public space is admired because we sweat the police? Or do we want to be a society where public space is admired because we admire each other?
Do we want to be a society where people follow rules only when watched? Or do we want to be a society where people follow rules because they understand that rules live for everyone’s benefit?
Do we want to be a society of individualities pursuing private gain at public expenditure? Or do we want to be a community where each person sees themselves as part of commodity larger?
These aren’t small questions. They’re the foundation of everything.
Conclusion
I went back to that machine stop a many days latterly. Same time, same crowd. This time, an old man was standing. Tired, leaning on a stick. A youthful girl, perhaps twelve times old, got up incontinently and offered him her seat. He smiled. She smiled. No bone said anything. But commodity had shifted. That small act did n’t change the world. But it changed that moment. And moments add up.
By: Neelam Tiwari
Write and Win: Participate in Creative writing Contest & International Essay Contest and win fabulous prizes.
About the Author
