Abu legal climate
The climate crisis is not some distant hypothetical — it is a lived reality that is reshaping the experiences of everyday life for communities all across the globe. Seas are rising to swallow homes, erratic weather is interfering with agriculture, and punishing heat is imperiling health and safety. The physical effects of climate change are evident, but the psychological effects are also staggering.
The climate emergency, for many young people especially, comes with a double impact; they experience the emotional weight of eco-anxiety while also being expected to be agents of change. This essay examines how the climate crisis impacts the mental health of young people, the challenges that such a double burden represents, and how being afraid can be a fecund source for a collective mobilization of young people. Reconceptualizing eco-anxiety as a driver of climate action could galvanize young people’s potential toward sustainable impacts.
Eco-anxiety, the chronic fear of environmental doom, has become one of the defining psychological conditions of our times. Unlike previous generational battles, climate change is global, existential, and marked by profound uncertainty. A Lancet survey found that nearly 60% of young people around the world said they were very worried about climate change; over half believed the world was doomed. An anticipatory grief, psychologists call it — mourning the futures that will be lost.
Youth exist in a special kind of limbo: old enough to understand the science and the stakes, but too young to wield the political or economic clout proportionate to the scale of the crisis. This disconnect breeds frustration, despair, and, in some cases, paralysis. But eco-anxiety is not just a pathology; it can be seen as evidence of ecological awareness and empathy for a beleaguered planet. Understanding this dualism is the key to moving from distress to productive engagement.
The dual weight of climate anxiety and responsibility is hefty for young people. On one hand, they are inheriting a crisis of other people’s making, a crisis primarily driven by older generations and the systems of entrenched fossil fuel dependency they’ve sustained. On the other hand, they are constantly informed that their activism, inventions, and lifestyle choices are key to staving off catastrophe.
As I have already said, this paradox is a nightmare that places an enormous psychological burden on the asylum seekers. And the youth climate movement, which includes Greta Thunberg and countless other grassroots activists, shows how profoundly young people absorb this responsibility. But, he added, “If we continue to put it on the shoulders of adolescents and young adults, if we continue to ask them to be burnt-out fire marshals, then thumb on you.”
Especially in the face of relentless, alarming news about climate, and apparent inaction on the part of governments, the feeling of betrayal is strengthening. In this way, the youth climate movement is driven not just by urgency, but also by intergenerational justice. Responding to this double burden means recognising that mental well-being and climate responsibility should not be the two horns of a dilemma on which young people are impaled.
Even though such conditions can be difficult to bear, eco-anxiety is a noteworthy motivation for activism. Studies have found that people with moderate levels of climate concern are more civically active and engage in more pro-environmental behaviors. Fear can be galvanizing when it turns from private despair to communal action. Fridays for Future is an example of this dynamic: millions of young people across the world take their worries to the streets in protests, strikes from school, and campaign organizations that force governments to deliver.
This shift dovetails with psychological theories about how we give life meaning: people are better able to deal with threats to their existence if they know that their actions are meaningful. If we can see eco-anxiety as a rational response that requires collective resolution, then young people can weaponise their fear as agency, rather than accepting it as a defeat. So, eco-anxiety is not just a mental health problem but a political asset in that it exacerbates urgency around climate action.
And schools are pursuing a central role in this transformation. In more traditional curricula, climate change is awkwardly slotted into a unit on natural disasters, fish or distant, at-risk places, and students are left unequipped or paralyzed. Yet teaching youth about climate, in a cross-disciplinary way that combines knowledge from science, economics, history, and ethics, can provide youth not just knowledge but also the tools to adapt and the tools to restore what is already being lost. You can’t predict the future — but climate literacy will give kids the tools to think their way through it.
In addition, schools can help nurture emotional resilience by offering channels for discussion, validating students’ fears, and teaching coping mechanisms, such as mindfulness or community service. When combined with initiatives like reforestation or renewable energy projects, education can evolve from a distant threat to a tangible tool for disaster prevention. Universities, meanwhile, can do more to scale up the agency of young people by enabling research, entrepreneurship, and work in partnership to link students to local places. In institutionalizing climate education, society ensures that eco-anxiety is not a solitary affliction, but an experience collectively shared as part of an educational process that produces sustainable leaders.
Bringing eco-anxiety to technology. Technology is another opportunity to turn eco-anxiety into empowerment. Digital media has enabled young people to link up across borders, share experiences, and mobilize quickly. Social media campaigns create an echo chamber for youth voices, raising global awareness of local fights — from wildfires in Australia to floods in Bangladesh. Meanwhile, the advances in technology itself provide us with practical climate change solutions. Apps that monitor carbon footprints, climate-friendly investment platforms, and citizen science initiatives all democratize participation. But digital engagement is a form of double-edged sword.
Being constantly exposed to climate-linked disasters on your screen can make the suffering worse, prompting doomscrolling and helplessness. Offsetting technological use with intentional design: platforms should promote positive problem-solving content alongside cautions. So technology is a means for people to collectively address a problem, rather than as something to be despaired of. Realising its potential demands critical digital literacy to avoid youth becoming passive consumers of climate news and active agents of change.
Community-led responses bridge the divide between personal anxiety and systemic solutions. From grassroots endeavors, say turning neglected spaces into urban gardens, to graphics representing renewable energy cooperatives and shoreline cleanup, we can see how together we can create a visible change. This is a way to give children control in their world, turning helplessness into mastery. And of course, this kind of initiative also builds solidarity across the generations.
When young people meet with elders, policymakers, and scientists, they not only increase their impact but also spread the responsibility more evenly. Cultural resources for resilience can serve as a social resource within the community. Caring for the land is deeply interwoven with identity and spirituality in many Indigenous traditions, for instance. Bringing back these strategies allows young people to relate their activism to larger narratives of continuity and belonging. And at the root, local engagement demonstrates that action on climate isn’t limited to large international gatherings or vague pledges, but so often starts at home with these small but significant steps.
Policy and institutional changes are required to sustain youth empowerment. While personal actions matter, the magnitude of the climate crisis requires systemic change. The time has come for governments to consider eco-anxiety as a valid public health concern and allocate appropriate resources accordingly. Mental health services should be designed to reflect climate-related stress, with eco-anxiety counseling.
Policies should also establish structural opportunities for easing the burden on youth. Investing in renewable energy, sustainable infrastructure, and green jobs gives youth hope and career prospects. Globally, having young people at climate talks ensures that their thoughts are not tokenized but included in decisions. By codifying intergenerational justice, policymakers could acknowledge the emotional challenges the young face while tackling the structural causes of the crisis. This two-pronged approach — mental support and systemic solutions — will transform eco-anxiety from an obstacle to participation into a path to resilience.
Converting eco-anxiety into climate power ultimately depends on a cultural change. We have to stop framing young people as “victims” of unstoppable catastrophe (they are not) or as “saviors” laden with unachievable expectations. Instead, they need to be treated as partners in creating sustainable futures. Storytelling is a key factor in driving this change. Stories of hope, endurance, and innovation provide a counterweight to apocalyptic visions.
Movies, stories, and art that focus on successful adaptation or resilience in communities can provide psychological relief and promote action. The popular culture we consume can therefore normalize climate action as part of life, rather than as an exceptional burden. When sustainability is integrated into cultural identity, young people can feel that their efforts align with the community’s values. This cultural reframe is so essential to staying in the game for the long term. Fear cannot in itself sustain a movement ad infinitum; it has to be complemented by hope, creativity, and solidarity.
“To conclude, the climate crisis has a double effect on the psyches of young people: they are at once the most anxiety-ridden generation in history and the most responsible for a problem that has been thrust upon them rather than of their own making. But there is an opportunity in this paradox. Eco-anxiety is, far from simply debilitating, a source of moral clarity and collective purpose.
When distress is reframed as a caring response, society can tap into that youthful energy to catalyze systemic change. Innovation in education, technology, community engagement, and policy reform all influence this transformation. Ultimately, the challenge is burrowing past eco-anxiety to channel it into constructive, sustained action. Young people’s terror at climate catastrophe can, when shared and mobilized, be a generative force for the construction of a just, resilient, and sustainable future.
By: Geonhwi Cho
Write and Win: Participate in Creative writing Contest & International Essay Contest and win fabulous prizes.
About the Author
