Abu legal climate
This silence is not hollow. It’s not apathy or lack of interest. Its weight, a responsibility on a generation that has grown up with Earth’s climate shifting at a rate quicker than any moment in time.
“When we talk about the climate crisis, people become quiet.”
We scroll through floodwaters on Instagram, laugh at climate-doom memes on TikTok, and carry “There Is No Planet B” bags, but we rarely ever really talk about it anymore.
Why?
Not apathy, but fatigue. In disillusion. In fear. And maybe even in hope’s silence. Hope that if we can no longer scream, then perhaps we will finally listen. The discussion over the climate between youth is no longer boisterous and insistent. It is quiet and exhausted, shaped by decades of being reminded that the apocalypse is imminent and seeing little shift. This essay considers why my generation became so silent regarding climate issues, how we are voicing concern through quiet methods, and why that silence needs to be translated into a new language of empathy and self-preservation.
We never heard that the world was warming like generations prior to us. We knew. From elementary school class assignments regarding threatened polar bears to chilling reports regarding wildfires and melting glaciers, environmental collapse was never a “what if.” It was our ambient noise. Having knowledge of something at all times, though, does not mean we are motivated to do something about it at all times. Rather, the more we know about the climate crisis, the more numb we become. Exposure has turned even the worst climate content into trends and entertainment. Heatwaves are greeted with humor. Videos mock rising temperatures. Internet humor like “Another heatwave? Must be Monday” or “Just bought an iced latte to drink before the ocean covers my city” isn’t disrespectful. It’s desperation masquerading as humor.
The jokes aren’t indifferent. They’re defense. It is how a stressed generation copes with terror it was never prepared for. We all talk less about the climate now because we are helpless. We have come of age watching the world’s leaders shake hands, pose for photographs, and promise the world a greener tomorrow for the planet in climate summits and international pacts that only vaporize into vague resolutions and political failures. These disappointments have bred a risky emotional reaction: climate nihilism. This is not exactly caring. Climate nihilism is not “I do not care.” It is “What is the point of caring if nothing changes? ” The product is a silent coolness surrounding abandonment.
But behind that coolness is anxiety, heartbreak, and burnout. Another reason why youth are hesitant to express their concerns is that the story of climate change rarely feels personal to them. For decades, climate action has proceeded using images of polar bears on shrinking ice, corals bleaching to death, and melting glaciers. These images are needed, but sometimes they don’t speak directly to people.
When you worry about whether your town will be safe in a flood, or food will cost more because of drought, or your house will be cool enough to sleep in during a heatwave, it is difficult to be touched by faraway wildlife or ecosystems. The climate emergency of today isn’t one of biodiversity or melting ice caps. It is one of the temperatures in our bedroom at night. It’s about how expensive staple foods have become. It’s about whether we can create safe lives and futures in a world that seems to be disintegrating. Climate change is no longer something we think about in the abstract. It has invaded the intimate, the personal, linked to our bodily and emotional health, our future livelihoods, and to the rhythms of our everyday lives. We respond more to the threat of migration for survival than to the imperative to save the world. Not that we don’t care.
It is that we are negotiating the crisis in human terms. Even though our voices are mute, we are not inactive. If you take a closer look, action on climate change surrounds us. It is low-key, humble, and profoundly individual. A person carries a vegan lunch to school not because it is trendy, but because it is eco-friendly. Another person buys second-hand only, not merely to save money, but to rebel against the fast fashion wastage. Another person commutes ten kilometers daily, not just for exercise, but because he is in favor of green mobility. These are not the mainstream and showy demonstrations of old. They are muted, reliable decisions made by individuals.
They are tiny actions that can sum. But we also understand that those tiny actions are not enough. Individual responsibility, though powerful, cannot be replaced by the need for structural change. We can’t pedal our way out of global emissions. We can’t turn our trash into a way to climate justice. We need collective systems commensurate in size to individual action. But today, there is a gap between what we do in our own lives and the broader political and social change we wish to create. What we need is a bridge — to connect quiet action with strong advocacy.
A way of turning silent intention into public momentum.
In order to regain that feeling of closeness, we need a new climate language. Outdated clichés like “Save the Earth” and “Time is Running Out” are no longer as effective as they used to be. For a generation bombarded with countdowns and declining timelines, these messages now inspire anxiety rather than action. Instead, we need to talk in terms of our own self-interest. We should be talking about “Let’s protect myself,” “Let’s protect my future employer,” or “Let’s protect air in my home.”. Climate activism must move from sacrifice to survival with integrity.
To accomplish this, we must reimagine the places and tools in which we engage with climate emotion, too. Consider a smartphone app where you can track your carbon footprint and share your results with friends in solidarity, not shame. Or a safe online space where people can reveal their climate fears anonymously and be met with empathy rather than silence. Climate education can be taught in schools by starting with science like “How does the climate crisis impact you?” rather than memorizing facts about greenhouse gases. Climate heroes must be celebrated not for what they accomplished but for what compelled them to accomplish it.
Why did they do it? What drove them? The climate emergency has left a psychological imprint on youth. Our silence is not ignorance, but the result of emotional exhaustion, decades of thinning emotions. A quiet fear in quest of a language that allows us to speak again. We need a space where silence is not queried, but listened to.
Where quiet gestures are not ignored, but amplified. We must rewrite the script from saving the planet to saving ourselves within the planet. If we are going to get young people back on the climate movement, we must stop telling them what to do and start asking them how they feel. We don’t need more slogans. We need more mirrors reflecting our interior life, our fear, our hope, and our humanity. Only then can our silence become connection. And from connection, we can build action.
By: JayIn Park
Write and Win: Participate in Creative writing Contest & International Essay Contest and win fabulous prizes.
About the Author
