It is a world in which information is an unstoppable digital river with no beginning and no end. A single swipe through your phone shows you the stories of wars, election fraud, and miracle pills that people with a large following promote. It may become exciting until it is not. The facts are accompanied by slick and shareable lies that go viral quicker than the truth. Peace in this age can we indeed discuss? Not only no bombs falling, but real peace: the one that enables societies to prosper, rely on each other, and create something of permanence. I would say no, unless I would address this challenge directly. Misinformation is not noise, it is an instrument that separates communities, it builds up conflicts and compromises world peace. But there is a hope, however, when we set about it prudently.
Have a flashback to an earlier less complicated time or even a time that we tend to romanticize. Prior to the internet news used to be carried by the news papers or the evening broadcasts. Of course, there were prejudices; Spanish-American war riot of 1898 riled yellow press, but very slowly. Falsehoods needed to be printed, disseminated and discussed live. Tweets have the potential to get viral within a few minutes, reaching out to millions of people before fact-checkers even react. Social networks such as and Tik Tok promote turmoil. Remember the 2020 U.S. election? Algorithms are encouraged to spread claims of massive voter fraud, which are enforced. Peace is based on some common reality; misinformation is fragmenting it into numerous pieces of furiousness.
This isn’t just abstract. We will take a look at tensions on the international level. Take the case of the Russia-Ukraine conflict, which is in the third year of its existence by 2026. The propaganda in Russian state media facilitates the rhetoric of denazification and aggression by the West. On the contrary, Ukrainian media and western sources report of unprovoked invasion. Each has its truths, but the war of disinformation and deepfakes of Zelenskyy yielding, videos of counterfeit atrocities are a poison put upon diplomacy. In a 2023 study, the Atlantic Council discovered that forty percent of all online information regarding the war was distorted. When the citizens are overwhelmed with other facts, leaders find it hard to negotiate.
And not only about geopolitics. Misinformation strikes back home and creates tribalism where neighbors are enemies. Anti-vax myths cost lives literally during the COVID-19 pandemic. The WHO named it an infodemic, as fake news about microchips in vaccines and magic illness-curing ivermectin led to decreased vaccine rates in hotspots like sections of the U.S. and Brazil. In this case, peace refers to providing people with wellbeing health and that is essential in stable societies. Fear-mongering takes science to the backseat, hospitals become overcrowded, economies yank, and resentment sets in. I have observed it in my personal social media channels: families being divided by the “plandemic” conspiracies. One of the uncles unfriended all the people following a heated WhatsApp argument. These cracks may develop into huge ones.
Why does this happen? Algorithms are not the sole cause of this blame, although they contribute some. The social media businesses are building feeds to ensure that people stay engaged, and this implies that outrage prevails. A polarising post receives ten times the number of shares of a subtle one. Next are the human-based psychology; the confirmation bias causes us to believe in the stories that support our perceptions. To this Daniel Kahneman described the reasoning in Thinking, fast and slow: our brains are more inclined to react fast and emotionally rather than think carefully. You add foreign participants such as the Internet Research Agency of Russia and wolf warrior bots of China and you have a storm. In 2024, the Oxford Internet Institute stated that 81 countries were the target of state-managed disinformation campaigns, usually to establish division during elections. Peace? It’s the first victim.
Nevertheless, there is still to be optimistic. History shows we can adapt. The printing press led to religious wars during the 16 th century though it also led to enlightenment. The Nazi propaganda was radio powered, but the allied broadcast contributed to victory in WWII. With the expansion of information technology, it is time that we expand too. To begin with, we should have media literacy education at an early stage. Imagine that schools are no longer being taught to check your sources, but to discern deep fakes, such as those hiccups in AI-generated videos. Finland is doing well in this field; their curriculum has made the transmission of fake news minimal, even with the interference of Russians. Their model was hailed in a 2025 UNESCO report, as it helps kids to ask questions, argue, and check. In the event that we could do the same thing on an international scale, we would be saving the world against fake news.
Technological solutions are significant as well. Platforms might modify their algorithms to be more factual than viral; the former Twitter Community Notes did this in part by crowdsourcing fact checks. Profit motives, however, do not align with this strategy; the Zuckerberg of Meta has acknowledged in the Congress that the priority is to engage first of all. Then we have regulation. The Digital Services Act of the EU, which is enhanced in 2025. Voluntary guidelines will not be enough in the U.S.; we should have actual accountability, such as the Australian media bargaining legislation of 2021 that made platforms pay to support good journalism. Watchdogs should be encouraged and trolls should not.
The governments have their share as well. They should be a good role model and they should not give alternative facts on the podium. Such laws as the disclosure of AI in political advertisements could help. International cooperation is also essential the existence of a “Geneva Convention on information warfare” proposed by such think tanks as RAND, where the countries come to a consensus on specific rules, including putting an end to deepfakes of leaders declaring war.
Naturally, it will not solve all the problems, and no deal ever does. But consider what we already possess in the physical world, rules prohibiting chemical weapons, prohibiting attack on civilians, prohibiting some types of torture. Our construction of those structures was not based on the assumption that we had faith in each government to have the right thing to do by themselves. We constructed them because we ourselves, having become through fatal loss to know, that certain lines must be drawn together. The same should be the case with the digital world. At this moment, all a teenager needs is a laptop and the appropriate software to get words in the mouth of a president, a fake surrender, a simulated massacre, and even when someone decides that the record is inaccurate, it is too late. Diplomats are negotiating peace as their citizens sit in front of their TVs watching absolutely different wars. It is that disjunction, between what is real and what is assumed, that makes conflicts, which is where conflicts are born. The world information system would not be ideal. Nations would go on the fiddle, loopholes would be tapped and administration would be sloppy. However, the presence of some standard, even a weak one, makes the dialogue different. It provides the journalists, courts, and civil society with something to refer to. It informs the world that playing around with reality and initiating a war is not grey, but a crime. And occasionally, the first thing to do to quit something is to name it.
People also possess power. The first rule is to stop and think before you talk. I do this: did I get this trustworthy? Is it a deliberate provocation to anger? Such platforms as NewsGuard could be used to rate web pages, and reverse image searches have the ability to reveal duct-taped fakes. The construction of bridges offline is also significant by use of community dialogues such as those observed in post-genocide reconciliation processes in Rwanda, where truth-telling was used to repair the tensions. In the Digital Age, mixed solutions based on the apps as the means of civil discourse and town halls might be used to restore confidence.
Finally, peace is not idle. It needs active efforts to bring up the efforts of educating minds, system reforms, and power retrieval in this age of excessive information mixed up with misinformation. We have learned how to control fire, electricity and the atom. We can also manage this fire of the digital realm. Silence is not the price of not acting, it is disorder, discord, and wars over created facts. Each day we procrastinate, another plot gets firm, another society is torn apart, another fact is covered by a load of noise. The overwhelming of information is unavoidable, however, with proper defenses and redirection, it can make life live to us, and not to drown us. The instruments are available, the information is there, and the will is something that we can only select to invoke. Now, ere another gigantic lie shall pull us down, Let us begin now.
By: Naomi Kanaya Revadanty Purwanto
Write and Win: Participate in Creative writing Contest & International Essay Contest and win fabulous prizes.
About the Author
