Effects of Global Conflicts on International Trade and Economies

By: Chinmay Khare

0
72
Conflicts Big Short Impact of the Russia-Ukraine War on the Economies
Conflicts Big Short Impact of the Russia-Ukraine War on the Economies
Put your rating for this post for encouraging the author

Unfortunately, wars and armed conflicts are yet to end in many areas around the world. Though localized in nature, the impact is great: reaching out to not only the economies of the warring nations but also to the global economy at large. Relations, markets, channels of supply, and international trade tie-ups are usually totally disrupted during constant conflicts period. This essay will examine the economic impacts of the global conflicts raging today, with specific attention to relationships in international trade.

The International Stage of Current Conflicts

The 21st century has thus far presented international audiences with various types of conflict, including the large-scale efforts by the U.S. to invade Iraq, which only led to instability in the Middle East, and the civil conflicts occurring in Syria, Yemen, and Libya. Recently, the Russian invasion of Ukraine cast a shadow over Europe by once again bringing interstate war onto that continent and threatening the relative stability of the global economic systems. The conflicts continue unabated across Africa-in Ethiopia, Sudan, and the Sahel region of West Africa, among others of different natures and scopes but definitely with all critical economic implications.

With modern conflicts including cyber warfare, sanctions, and economic measures as weapons of war, the pictures of the traditional perception of military conflicts are increasingly irrelevant. Regional conflicts are now setting off ripples even to affect economies and trade relations far beyond the immediate zones of conflict due to the interdependence of the global economy.

Disruptions to Global Supply Chains

Maybe the most direct impact of war on international trade is through disruption to global supply chains. Today’s supply chains are highly globalized, incorporating rather complex network structures that cut across many countries. Conflicts in any hub of major trade or in resource-rich areas can immediately trigger shockwaves across global markets.

And the best example is Ukraine. These are two countries that have held significant market shares of essential goods like wheat, corn, and sunflower oil. Russia, in particular, has been playing a critical role as a supplier of energy, specifically natural gas and oil, to Europe. This conflict has severely disrupted such exports and fueled sharp increases in global food prices and fuel costs. Countries depended on wheat imports from Ukraine and Russia, majorly countries in the Middle East, North Africa, as well as some of Asia; they have seen their food inflation rocketing to produce political and social instability.

Similarly, energy markets have been severely impacted. European countries-many of which rely on Russia for their gas have faced shortages and astronomically high energy prices, exerting upward pressures on inflation across the continent. Consequently, nations have had to look elsewhere for alternative energy supplies, upsetting long-standing trade relationships in the energy sector. The action is thus reshaping the geopolitical topography as Europe turns to the United States, North Africa, and the Middle East for new energy relationships.

Industrial supply chains have also been impacted. War has interrupted the production of semiconductors and other vital industrial inputs, which is delaying the manufacturing of automobiles electronics, and other products globally. Economic shocks from the disruption ripple through and hobble industries that are dependent, reducing their production capacities, increasing consumer prices, and shedding employment.

Trading sanctions represent the most frequently used tool in economic warfare at the international level. Sanctions often have been imposed as a means by which one country can isolate its adversary economically, limit its access to capital, and exert pressure toward negotiating or changing the latter’s behavior. Although sanctions may prove effective, they have a significant knock-on impact on global trade and economic relations.

Sanctions imposed on Russia following its invasion of Ukraine have been the most severe experienced since the beginning of this century. Imposed by the European Union, United States, and other Western powers, sanctions are placed upon Russian banks and industries as well as individuals among many severe measures. The sanctions have blocked Russia from global financial systems, limited its access to Western technologies, and strictly prohibited its capacity for exporting commodities, such as oil and gas. However, these sanctions have commanded heavy economic retaliatory costs on the countries imposing them. European countries that had relied much on Russian energy faced an energy crisis that caused a lot of stress to their economies, increased inflation, and put in peril economic growth.

Sanctions can spur the formation of new trading blocs because sanctioned countries increase their dependencies with other partners. Russia has made efforts to revive its trade ties with China, India, and other non-Western economies. The reorientation has brought new alliances and intensified the process of de-dollarization of trade as countries tend to veer away from using the U.S. dollar due to Western economic sanctions.

Similarly, sanctions that target Iran are affecting the global energy market, and those against Venezuela partly cause instability in Latin American trade relations. The increased reliance on economic sanctions as a tool of war continues to reflect a wider tendency toward a more fully economicized international order, but these often have the effects of long-term realignments across global trade networks with largely unpredictable consequences.

Effects on Multilateralism and Global Cooperation

Wars and conflicts also consume multilateralism and international cooperation, which forms the bedrock of stable trade relations. International institutions such as WTO, IMF, and the World Bank came into existence as an engine to fuel cooperation, free trade, and economic stability. All of these break down whenever countries are at each other’s throats or outside control.

For instance, the conflict in Ukraine has led to a “cold war” of sorts between the Western democracies and authoritarian regimes, most famously China and Russia. Under these conditions, fragmentation of international economic governance emerges because countries are strongly perceived to be aligned with one bloc or another based on either political or strategic considerations. This polarization has greatly complicated efforts to address global economic challenges such as climate change, public health crises, and global trade reform.

Against this background, the weakening of international cooperation poses a specific problem at a time of the all-new, interconnected crises affecting the world-from the pandemic and climate change to rising inequality. Conflicts divert from those global challenges and leave economies in even deeper vulnerability. The international community suffers enormously from this loss of cooperation: Modern warfare weakens cooperation in so many areas where the world works together on trade, finance, and development.

Humanitarian Costs and Long-term Economic Impact

Countries’ economies suffer long-term costs in case of a war. Infrastructure destruction, loss of human capital, and erosion of national wealth characterize such a scenario. Reconstruction efforts may take more than three decades. The cost of rebuilding the entire economy that is war-torn is humongous.

For example, consider Syria. Decades of civil war have simply bulldozed its infrastructure to the ground, and its GDP is but a fraction compared to where it once was: more than 60% and many millions of people have been forced to flee. Afghanistan, on the other hand, has suffered at the hands of more than four decades of conflict, which has made the nation one of the poorest and most underdeveloped in the world. Naturally enough, there are no promising economic recoveries in sight for either nation because political instability and insecurity discourage much-needed foreign investment, discourage trade, and completely do away with development.

Economic dimensions arise in the displacement of populations in war. Refugee flows put pressure on the host countries’ economies often forcing for a rise in public spending on health care, housing, and social services. Mass displacement in a few instances does trigger economic growth while in most cases does leads to economic and social pressures in neighborly countries whereby trade and other economic and stability-related factors are affected. 
 
Conclusion

Ongoing wars around the world are redrawing the landscape of international trade relations and global economic dynamics in significant and profoundly impactful ways. Wars are breaking up supply chains, drastically changing energy markets, and triggering inflationary pressures as well as adjusting the realignment of global trade blocs. Trade sanctions and economic measures have become the new nuts and bolts of modern warfare, promising both opportunities and challenges to the economies of the globe at large. The negative spillover of wars is seen in the dismantling of multilateralism, diminishing cooperation at the global level, and away from more historic crises such as climate change and inequality.

Economic impacts of war do indeed appear to hit home most sharply on participating countries; however, the international ramifications tend to emphasize the substantial interdependence that exists in the global economy today. After all, the shakeout of war extends far beyond national borders into international trade, financial markets, and regional economic stability as well. These challenges will thus require innovative policy solutions, renewed commitment to multilateralism, and rebalancing diplomacy and conflict resolution. Thus, if the world enters that abyss without these efforts, it will only drift into the prospects of economic fragmentation and instability where the definition of the international economic landscape becomes characterized by conflict.

By: Chinmay Khare

Write and Win: Participate in Creative writing Contest & International Essay Contest and win fabulous prizes.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here